🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and families are observing with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising number of countries are moving toward comparable bans.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that phones and apps are "robbing our kids' childhood". A law may be enacted soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on parliament to approve a law lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to restrict their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is given. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a useful starting point," commented one European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the government has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "based on robust research".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. An organization set up by the relatives of a girl who was lost after encountering dangerous platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for minors," said a influential peer.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, regulation is primarily unfolding at the local level due to national inaction.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further use dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills mandating guardian approval for minors to open social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from some individuals to mimic Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Outside of these regions, further states are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, global agencies take a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this worldwide discussion evolves, the actions of this nation and others indicate that states globally are increasingly willing to wait for platforms to self-regulate.